|
JOE
SCARBOROUGH, HOST: Tonight, a special SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY, the murder of
Paul Johnson in Saudi Arabia.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
GEORGE W. BUSH,
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: These are barbaric people. There‘s no
justification whatsoever for his murder. And yet, they killed him in cold
blood.
DICK CHENEY,
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: America will hunt down these
killers, find them one by one, and destroy them.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
And swift justice in Saudi Arabia. The man who claimed responsibility for
Johnson‘s murder, al Qaeda‘s top figure there, killed by Saudi forces.
The Saudi
government says it did everything it could to find Johnson and called his
killers barbarians.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
ADEL AL-JUBEIR,
FOREIGN POLICY ADVISOR TO THE SAUDI CROWN PRINCE: His brutal murder
illustrates the cruelty and inhumanity of the enemy we all are fighting.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Tonight, we have a special two-hour SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY, “The Murder of
Paul Johnson.” How did it happen? What‘s next? And what affect will his
murder have on America, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the world?
ANNOUNCER:
This is a SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY special report. Here‘s Joe Scarborough.
SCARBOROUGH:
Welcome to our show tonight. We have NBC News‘ Jim Miklaszewski with us,
live from the Pentagon.
Mike,
obviously, it was a tragic day. Give us the latest developments.
JIM
MIKLASZEWSKI, NBC NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Well, according to U.S. officials,
they have confirmed, of course, what Saudi officials have said, is that
following the murder, the decapitation of Paul Johnson sometime today in
Saudi Arabia, Saudi authorities actually came upon the perpetrators, the
head of al Qaeda operations there in Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz al-Mughrin
and three of his cohorts, apparently disposing of the body on Friday night
in Saudi Arabia.
A shootout
ensued and al-Mughrin and the three al Qaeda cohorts were all killed.
Now Saudis, of
course, are hailing this as a huge victory over al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia.
However, some U.S. officials are raising their eyebrows at the timing.
They are wondering if, in fact, the Saudis perhaps didn‘t have some kind
of lead on al-Mughrin earlier and perhaps could have prevented the
decapitation and killing of Paul Johnson.
That aside,
even U.S. officials say this is a huge blow against al Qaeda, at least
there in Saudi Arabia.
Al-Mughrin, of
course, is no stranger to counterterrorism officials. He actually joined
in the fight against Saudi Arabia when he was—I mean, against the Soviet
Union in Afghanistan when he was only 17, went on to fight in Bosnia and
was eventually actually jailed in Saudi Arabia and released in August
2001, just one month before 9/11 for what was, quote, “good behavior,”
unquote.
However, some
U.S. officials, despite the fact that it appears that at least this
portion of the terrorist saga there in Saudi Arabia is wrapped up, that
there are still many others like al-Mughrin still prepared to launch
attacks against Westerners in Saudi Arabia.
SCARBOROUGH:
Mike, take us behind the scenes over the past few days at the State
Department and the Pentagon. What exactly did the administration do
regarding contacts with the Saudi government to try to move to save Mr.
Johnson before this deadline approached?
MIKLASZEWSKI:
Well, there was a very concerted effort by not only State Department,
Justice Department officials, law enforcement officials, not much in terms
of U.S. military operations, although there were offers to share
intelligence where that was possible.
But—but nobody
had a good lead on exactly where Paul Johnson or his captors may have
been. And as we know now, all those efforts were for naught.
Now I can tell
you that there is—the State Department is preparing to send an emergency
security team over to the embassy and by sometime next week, a team of
U.S. Marines, so-called fast team are expected, about 30 to 40 Marines are
expected to head over to the embassy there to increase security for U.S.
embassy employees.
But there are
somewhere between 30,000 to 40,000 Americans still in Saudi Arabia, still
considered to be targets of any terrorists who remain in that country.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, thanks so much, Jim Miklaszewski at the Pentagon. We greatly
appreciate it.
MIKLASZEWSKI:
You bet you.
SCARBOROUGH:
We now bring in MSNBC‘s terror expert, Steve Emerson.
He‘s with us.
So is former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt.
Let me start
with you, Steve Emerson. Obviously, a tragic day for the Johnson family,
for the people of New Jersey, in fact for the people of America. But how
significant is it that the leader of al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia was
confirmed killed in a shootout with authorities over there?
STEVE EMERSON,
MSNBC TERRORISM EXPERT: Joe, the problem is that he should have been
taken out or at least kept in jail, because he had been arrested four
years ago and basically had his sentence commuted and let out for, quote,
“good behavior” two years ago.
And he‘s had
been operating on Saudi soil essentially for two years with virtual
impunity. It should not have taken a decapitation of an American in such
a gruesome manner to have finally captured and killed this man. He should
have been arrested and taken off the streets years ago.
The problem is,
Joe, that this has been a disaster that the Saudi Arabian government has
largely been responsible for in terms of espousing and creating incitement
that recruits, people like Mr. Al-Mughrin, who ended up saying it‘s all
right to kill Americans and decapitate them in any way I want to.
SCARBOROUGH:
Well, Steve Emerson, OK, but now he‘s—now he‘s dead.
EMERSON:
Right.
SCARBOROUGH:
He‘s off the streets. Is that a victory of the war on terror? Or do you
believe, like some U.S. officials that are raising eyebrows, that the
Saudi officials have too close of a relationship with these terrorists and
they could have nailed him before Paul Johnson was murdered?
EMERSON: Well,
Joe, it‘s never either or. I think it‘s definitely—you know, one less
terrorist off the streets is definitely one less bad guy around. On the
other hand there are others willing to move up the ranks.
Here is a guy,
by the way, that basically got his—he had his 12 hours of fame today. He
became a general in the al Qaeda network and now he‘s gone, and somebody
else has taken his place.
The question is
how many others are out there and how many Saudi officials are really
turning a blind eye? And where are they turning a blind eye to the
creation of Islamic militancy? How are they fostering this? What types
of moneys are they pumping into these groups?
And are Saudi
security forces turning a blind eye to those in al Qaeda that have
operated for years now with almost total autonomy? And that‘s a key
question that we keep asking.
Every single
time an event like this happens, we say, “Oh, the Saudis are going to do
something. They‘re going to round up more people, the usual suspects.”
But in the end, they‘re going to weather the storm. They had the news
conference today in Washington. It was for the American consumption, not
the Saudi consumption.
And the real
question is, are we going to finally demand that they change their ways?
And I‘m afraid not. Maybe we will. I think there are people at the
Justice Department and the FBI that really want to stop this monster from
becoming the Frankenstein that it has almost become fully worldwide.
SCARBOROUGH:
Clint Van Zandt, let me bring you in today. Obviously, a big development
today. The FBI was reportedly conducting house-to-house raids in Riyadh
to save Paul Johnson.
Tell us about
the FBI‘s role in the activities, the security activities today in Saudi
Arabia. And wasn‘t that unprecedented?
CLINT VAN
ZANDT, FORMER FBI PROFILER: Well, this was something you‘re not going to
hear much about, especially from the Saudis. The Saudis want to give the
impression that they can do this all themselves. But they don‘t have the
technical skills, the negotiation skills, the profilers, and the FBI‘s
hostage rescue team is second to none as far as going into a hostage
rescue mission.
So first of
all, the FBI has a legal attache, one of the 45 countries in the world
where there‘s an FBI presence. Now, this has come about, Joe, as you
know, kicking and screaming from the Saudis part after the bombing of the
Khobar Tower. FBI Director Louis Freeh went over there trying to wring
information out of Saudis, and they wouldn‘t give it up.
So this has
been really slow, and the chickens are starting to come to roost for the
Saudis.
Now this
house-to-house search that has been conducted the last few days. This is
like 15,000 Saudi police officers, probably FBI agents assisting, although
the Saudis will never tell you that, and even firemen.
You know, Joe,
we take firemen with us because they find ways to get into the buildings
that sometimes law enforcement don‘t find.
So this was a
door-to-door, house-to-house search. But again, you know, I question how
quickly they were able to, unfortunately, kill this American and then how
quickly shortly thereafter, the Saudis find them and of course, kill them
all so we can‘t talk, we can‘t interview anybody.
And you know,
this is not just dust your hands off and say, “OK, you know, four of them
and one American, now we‘re even.” This is going to continue. As Steve
says, there is going to be other corporals who are going to be want to be
generals in al Qaeda who are going to step up to bat again.
And if the
Saudis don‘t draw a line in the sand and say, “No more. Oil or no oil,
we‘re not going to allow terrorism to continue,” we‘re going to see this
happen over and over again.
SCARBOROUGH:
And you know, Clint, unfortunately there has been a long history of the
Saudis, like you said, not cooperating. Back when I was in Congress, the
Armed Services Committee, 1998, the killings at Khobar Towers. There were
some men from my district who were killed there. We tried to
investigate.
The Saudis
obstructed us. I mean, you could only call it obstruction of justice.
They would not let us get near the people that committed these acts of
terror.
I want to play
for both of you gentlemen a visibly angry President Bush in Seattle
earlier today, responding to Paul Johnson‘s murder.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
BUSH: The
murder of Paul shows the evil nature of the enemy we face. These are
barbaric people. There is no justification whatsoever for his murder.
And yet they killed him in cold blood.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Steve Emerson, the president of the United States is correct. They killed
him in cold blood. But I can tell you, I‘ve been speaking to some
Americans since the killing today and they‘re all asking the same
question. What can we do to strike back? And are all Americans over are
all Americans over in Saudi Arabia basically at the mercy of al Qaeda
terrorists?
EMERSON:
Absolutely, Joe, they are at the mercy of al Qaeda terrorists, and the
State Department has asked they leave but they‘ve lived there for years or
they have high-paying contracts and they don‘t want to run. Now I
understand that.
On the other
hand, there is not much you can do if you‘re dependent upon a regime that
essentially incites and protects some of the very people that are
attacking you.
The question is
what can we do here? Look, it‘s moral outrage. It‘s the same moral
outrage that erupted after 9/11 when 15 of the 19 hijackers emerged from
Saudi Arabia to carry out devastating killings in the United States.
SCARBOROUGH:
Steve, I‘m sorry, I‘ve got to interrupt you. I want to ask you, because
you just made a statement that many Arab-Americans might consider
inflammatory. You said the Saudi government actually incites these people
and—and promotes this type of behavior. How do they do that?
EMERSON: Well,
the Saudi government, per se, doesn‘t operate as a unified government.
What you have in the Saudi government are competing fiefdoms, the
religious affairs ministry, the interior ministry. You have the Saudi
religious establishments, the WATS (ph).
And those are
groups and establishments that promote incitement that are on Saudi
television, in the media, on the Internet saying that either Jews or
Christians or infidels are the enemies of Islam. And they are absolutely
the ones responsible for creating this culture and this climate of
ideological violence that ends up being used by militants such as al-Mughrin
to say it‘s OK to kill Americans.
That‘s the real
issue here. Lisa Myers did a phenomenal report last week showing that a
key top Saudi official, and one of the leaders of Saudi Arabia, blamed
international Zionists for the attacks several weeks ago in Saudi Arabia.
Clearly, they
are trying to focus anger against the, quote, “enemies of Islam” without
dealing with the extremist elements within themselves.
Joe, I might
add that tonight I just saw an A.P. story in which the reactions from
Saudis on the street in that same district was the Americans all deserve
it.
Reality is that
there is, unfortunately, a high degree of support for bin Laden and
Islamic militancy that we don‘t want to recognize or admit to, because
that would say that the mainstream is radical.
SCARBOROUGH:
Steve, you‘re exactly right. Earlier this week, we—we showed a poll that
over 50 percent of Saudi residents actually supported bin Laden and what
he‘s been doing over the past several years.
I want to
read—I want to read, though, quickly. I have a couple of things I want to
read you guys. One came from the BBC web site tonight. It posted—it was
actually a statement by a prominent Saudi cleric. It surprised me.
That‘s why I want you to read it—hear about it.
And he said
this at Islam‘s holiest shrine. He said the hostage takers and the
murderers committed grave sins under Islam and said “whoever kills any
person under our protection will not go to heaven,” speaking of those that
committed these murders earlier today.
And I also want
to read you a quick timeline of terror attacks in Saudi Arabia. Of
course, May of last year, suicide bombers attack three housing compounds,
killing 35 people.
Looking at
recent history, May 1 this year, gunmen attacked an American-based
company, killing six Westerners and a Saudi. May 22, gunmen shot a German
in Riyadh. Late May, terrorists had attacks on an oil compound in Khobar,
killing 22.
And this June
2, BBC reporters were shot, one was killed, and in an al Qaeda stronghold
outside of Riyadh, the other wounded. And it escalated this afternoon, of
course, with another vicious murder, this time American citizen Paul
Johnson.
Clint, let me
get final comments from you.
VAN ZANDT:
Yes. Well, you just mentioned the most recent, Khobar Tower, where 22
people were killed. You know, the Saudis supposedly surrounded that
compound, and yet mysteriously three of the four killers somehow slipped
away. I don‘t—you know, I don‘t buy that. I don‘t buy it at all.
There is
something that continues to go on there where the Saudis support that type
of activity. And if they want to sell oil to us, sell oil but be our
friend and don‘t let this go on. If not, we‘ve got to find somebody else
to—to go the pump for, Joe.
SCARBOROUGH: I
agree with you. Unfortunately, administrations, both Republican and
Democrat have allowed the Saudi government to play both sides for too
long. It‘s got to stop.
Now, still
ahead, the world is reacting to the murder of American hostage Paul
Johnson. We‘re going to also find out how this barbaric act could impact
U.S.-Saudi relations. That‘s next.
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
SCARBOROUGH:
How is the Arab world reacting to Johnson‘s murder?
Earlier, Saudi
government official Adel al-Jubeir made this statement.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
AL-JUBEIR:
Today we are faced with the tragedy of this gruesome death at the hands of
barbarians who have rejected the teachings of their faith and the
principles of humanity. His brutal murder illustrates the cruelty and
inhumanity of the enemy we all are fighting.
On behalf of my
country and every individual with a sense of decency and humanity, I offer
our most heart-felt condolences to his family and friends.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
I‘m joined now on the phone by Charlene Gubash. She‘s NBC News producer
in Cairo, Egypt. And also, we have Raid Quspi. He‘s Riyadh bureau chief
for “Arab News.”
Let me begin
with you, Charlene. What‘s the reaction in Egypt? How are they reacting
to this news?
CHARLENE GUBASH,
NBC NEWS CAIRO BUREAU CHIEF: Hello, Joe.
The few people
we were able to reach tonight, because it‘s very late here, were shocked
and really horrified by this news. They thought that it was terrible that
he was taken hostage in the first place, that his eyes were bandaged like
that. They couldn‘t believe that he was killed. And—and they were pretty
much horrified by that.
And—and a far
as newspaper coverage, the newspapers here go to print very early, so they
didn‘t manage to get it in print. But “al-Hayat,” which is like our “New
York Times,” had a big headline which read, “Riyadh delivers a big blow to
the terrorists with the killing of al-Mughrim and three other wanted men
after slaughtering the hostage.”
SCARBOROUGH:
How is that—how do you expect that to play in the Middle East? The fact
that the leader of al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia was killed in the events
earlier today?
GUBASH: Well,
especially in Egypt, people are going to be very happy about that. They
hate terrorism in Egypt after having suffered from it directly for more
than 10 years, and especially because a lot of their business is—Egypt run
on tourism; it‘s their biggest money earner here. And many of their
businesses were hurt by it, so they know how devastating terrorism can be
to them and also how horrific it is after something like the Luxor
massacre.
So in general,
people here are pretty happy to see someone like this be killed.
SCARBOROUGH:
Raid Quspi, let me bring you in. Obviously, there have been reports over
the past several weeks of polls showing that as many as 50 percent of
Saudi citizens supporting some of the things that Osama bin Laden has
stood for in the past.
How do you
believe the Arab street, as it‘s called, is going to be responding in
Saudi Arabia to reports of the killing of Paul Johnson and then, of
course, the killing of al Qaeda‘s leader in Saudi Arabia?
RAID QUSPI,
RIYADH BUREAU CHIEF, “ARAB NEWS”: Well, let‘s not forget sir, that Saudis
are victims of terror, as well. I mean, since May 12 and until this
evening, over 60 to 70 of our own nationals have been killed by these
outlaws, the renegades who are going about slaying not just Westerners but
Saudis and innocent children—children and women and elderly, as well.
They—I mean, it
has been known and from people I have spoken to, from locals and residents
and even civilians there was a sense of shock and despair, of course,
to—to the gruesome killing of Mr. Johnson.
And—but at the
same time, there was a sense of a lot of Saudis were relieved to hear that
al Qaeda leader in the kingdom was—was killed, and two other on the most
wanted terror list were also killed in the capital today.
SCARBOROUGH:
Since September 11 -- Since September 11, many Americans have blamed the
Saudi government for trying to have it both ways by verbally attacking
terrorists but not taking a hard enough line against them.
Do you believe
the attacks that began in Saudi in may of last year, leading up to the
attack today, may be causing the Saudi government to crack down on al
Qaeda more than it did before the attacks came to Riyadh last year?
QUSPI: Well,
yes, that‘s a good question. I think that our Mr. Al-Jubeir announced in
Washington that the Saudi has taken drastic actions to, A, for example to
monitor our charities. Ours are no longer unmonitored, and now a specific
government body which has sponsored on international ground will be
monitoring our charities to make sure and to—to guarantee that they don‘t
go to the wrong hands.
We have sacked
several imams in the past, and we continue to monitor our mosques now and
to make sure that hatred and speech of intolerance is not being used in
our sermons.
Several
measures have been taken. One of the new measures that we‘re taking is
we‘re cooperating on the intelligence level with the United States and
several other countries.
We‘re beefing
up security. I have been told that some 15,000 security officers were
taking place in the combing of several districts in the capital over the
past couple of weeks. For the first time today, we have seen Special
Forces units and Hummers and armored vehicles as well as helicopters
hovering the areas.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right.
QUSPI: So
there has been drastic measures been taking place.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right. Thank you so much. We appreciate that report. Raid Quspi
and also Charlene Gubash.
Now, for more
reaction from the Arab world as seen in America, I‘m joined by Salameh
Nematt. He‘s Washington bureau chief for “Al-Hayat” newspapers, and also
James Zogby of the Arab-American Institute.
James Zogby,
let me begin with you and get your reaction to the events of today.
JAMES ZOGBY,
ARAB-AMERICAN INSTITUTE: Well, I‘m just horrified, devastated. I‘ve
known so many Americans who‘ve worked in the kingdom. I know their Saudi
partners, and I know that they‘re devastated, as well. And the family of
this poor Paul Johnson, I know they‘ve suffered enormously during this
long ordeal.
And I think
that there‘s just no justification for the barbarity of the act. And I
think that many Saudis, the Saudis I spoke with feel exactly the same
way.
But let me just
make a point here, Joe, about the thousands of Americans whose work in the
kingdom. I‘d go over and see them. I‘ve done -- I have a weekly
television show on one of the Arab television networks, and I‘ve done the
TV show with them because of my concern for them.
And I think
this is a difficult time for them. They‘ve witnessed one of their
colleagues murdered in this brutal way. And we—you know, we have to
recognize the perilous situation they‘re in and be thankful the Saudis are
finally acting. And I hope acting in a vigorous way and will continue to
act until this evil is rooted out.
The partnership
between the two countries has been a great one, and I think that now the
partnership has to be strengthened so that these—these terrorists don‘t
win.
SCARBOROUGH:
And the Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah certainly agrees with you. And he
warned that the militants who murdered Johnson earlier today were going to
be facing tough times ahead.
He said, “Be
assured that the kingdom has enough men whom you haven‘t seen so far but
within the coming days, you will see them.”
Salameh, let me
ask you, is the house of Saud in danger of facing the type of revolution
that the Shaw of Iran faced in 1979?
SALAMEH NEMATT,
WASHINGTON D.C. BUREAU CHIEF, “AL-HAYAT”: I don‘t think there‘s a fear of
revolution but there is no doubt that the—the murder of Paul Johnson is
part of a terror campaign that is waged by al Qaeda and its affiliates.
They are
targeting first the regimes that are ruling in the region. Saudi Arabia
is part of that, and the west. And what—the main target is to sever the
relationships between Saudi Arabia and the West, because they want to
reclaim that country.
These—these
terrorists are similar to Taliban in—in Afghanistan. They want—they‘re
seeking power, and they believe that by undermining the ruling family in
Saudi Arabia they can gain power, especially if they succeeded in creating
the rift with the United States and Saudi Arabia, undermining that country
and maybe convincing the Americans to look elsewhere for oil resources and
achieving their purpose.
This is their
strategic goal, and as such the Saudis here targeted as much as the—the
Americans and the west.
SCARBOROUGH:
And—and how—how likely is that, that al Qaeda and other terror groups
could actually destabilize the Saudi government, drive foreigners out of
there and in the end, lead the Saudi royal family being overthrown?
ZOGBY: I
don‘t—you want to go, Salameh?
NEMATT: I
don‘t think that they can achieve that unless the United States actually
gives up on its alliance with Saudi Arabia.
ZOGBY: Right.
NEMATT: If
they do give up this relationship, this strategic relationship, then
they‘re weakening the Saudi royal family and undermining their credibility
internally and internationally. Most of the Saudis won‘t accept that.
Unfortunately,
there is some sympathy for these terrorists in Saudi Arabia, and mainly
because there is a lot of disenchantment with the lack of democracy in
Saudi Arabia, the lack of free forums. But this is by no means a
justification.
I don‘t think
there is any Saudi who just wakes up in the morning and decides to go and
commitment such a barbarous act. I think there are organizations are
financed and funded, and they‘re provided with logistical support to carry
out these crimes. And I think the Saudis...
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, got to...
NEMATT: ...
are fighting as hard as they can.
SCARBOROUGH:
We‘re going to have to leave it there. Salameh and James Zogby, thank you
so much for being with us. And we‘ll be right back in a minute.
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
(NEWS BREAK)
ANNOUNCER:
Welcome back to a SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY special report.
Once again, Joe
Scarborough.
SCARBOROUGH:
The terrorists who killed Paul Johnson sent a chilling message to the
world about their brutality. But their intended audience is much smaller,
about 30,000 American workers in the Saudi kingdom. They‘re the
engineers, the technicians and the executives who guarantee the free flow
of oil, the oil that powers America‘s and the world‘s economy. So what
happens if American workers flee their increasingly dangerous situation?
We have
Lawrence Kudlow. He‘s in CNBC‘s “KUDLOW & CRAMER.” Also, we have Mike
Battles, who co-founded the security firm Custer Battles and who‘s worked
as a CIA operative.
Let me begin
with you first, Lawrence Kudlow. Al Qaeda is trying to destabilize Saudi
Arabia and the world economy. Do you think the attack today may help them
succeed?
LAWRENCE KUDLOW,
“KUDLOW & CRAMER”: Well, I don‘t know. I think I got to give the Saudi
security forces some credit because they were able to nail that guy and
some of his assistants. We‘ll learn more as time passes. They had quite
a large sweep. Police, fire, security forces, U.S. FBI was involved.
Hopefully, more of that‘s coming.
But I think
what you said earlier is right. Basically, they can‘t get to the
pipelines because there is tremendous security around the Saudi pipelines,
but they can get to the apartment houses and the dormitories to go after
people who are running the pipelines. And of course, the big problem on
that is there are terrorist agents on terrorist sympathizers inside those
residential compounds, and they‘re the ones who tend to let them in, and
that‘s exactly where the undercover work has got to operate.
SCARBOROUGH:
Larry, what‘s this going to do to the oil prices, not only on Monday, but
also, obviously, for the rest of the summer, when more Americans are out
traveling around than ever?
KUDLOW: Well,
I think we already put a big risk premium on oil prices. And I think
we‘ve been seeing oil slip down. The Saudis have been true to their
word. They‘ve increased their oil production by some two to
two-and-a-half million barrels. They‘re moving in on ten million barrels
a day, as they promised, and I think that‘s been a big help. The issue
here, Joe, is at this point, can the terrorists actually get to the
pipeline and disrupt operations? That‘s where the rubber meets the road.
They achieved that goal in Iraq, although the volume of pumping is much
smaller. The question is now, can we keep them out of Saudi oil pipes?
SCARBOROUGH:
But Larry, what happens now if the situation on the ground for Americans
working over in Saudi Arabia becomes so dangerous, so untenable that they
have to leave? What kind of impact does that have on the free flow of oil
out of Saudi Arabia and across the world?
KUDLOW: It‘ll
have a negative impact. There‘s no question about that. But I think
here, you know, we get to the heart and soul of this battle, and I think
we should not hesitate to put American special operatives on the ground,
FBI people, CIA people. I think we should help teach the Saudis. The
kingdom is under threat right now. The kingdom‘s very survival is being
threatened. It looks like they‘re getting wise and they‘re beginning to
defend themselves. They‘re going to need U.S. know-how how to do it, and
I think that‘s where we have to go. And we‘ve got to try to keep the men
and women on the ground operating these pipelines.
SCARBOROUGH:
Now, Mike Battles, you‘ve worked in Saudi Arabia and Iraq, trying to
protect not only Americans but also Western workers. Talk about the
situation in Saudi Arabia. And is there anything the United States
government can do, working in concert with the Saudis, to protect
Americans, or as I asked earlier, are American workers simply at the mercy
of al Qaeda terrorists?
MIKE BATTLES,
CO-FOUNDER, CUSTER & BATTLES: There are certainly ways to identify,
quantify and mitigate the risks to workers working in Saudi Arabia, but
that may not work in the short term. It‘s going to take a little bit
longer. Bear in mind that the Wahhabi fundamentalists in Saudi Arabia
have the kingdom on the ropes, and have for 30 years. It‘s just in recent
years that we‘ve really have paid attention to it because the demographics
have shifted so much. You got 70 percent of the populace under age 35,
over 50 percent unemployment and uneducated. Every try to reason with a
sophomore at Berkeley? It‘s almost impossible. And now you‘ve got the
riled masses angry at the American foreign policy.
The problem
that we really see is the economic impact could be catastrophic because if
it causes $100-a-barrel oil and mass inflation in the States, it can be
difficult. And it‘s really difficult to get most moderate Arabs to
participate in violent terrorist activity. The vast majority of Muslims
don‘t support that. But they‘re still angry with the United States and
our foreign policy and so economic...
SCARBOROUGH:
So Mike, what do you do?
BATTLES: ...
jihad is an easier sell...
SCARBOROUGH:
Sure. So what do you do to fight against economic jihad?
BATTLES:
You—we try the best we can to keep the free flow of oil coming out of the
foreign sources that we are dependent upon. We make sure that the Saudi
government has the ability to continue to increase output until we can get
Iraq on line. And we look for African sources of oil. We look for some
more out of Eastern Europe, and we try to change that balance as quickly
as possible.
KUDLOW: You
know, Joe...
SCARBOROUGH:
Lawrence...
KUDLOW: One of
the...
SCARBOROUGH:
Go ahead, Lawrence. Wrap it up.
KUDLOW: Let me
make a point here. One of the most extraordinary things in the last 24
hours was Vladimir Putin‘s statement that the Russian secret service told
us that Iraq, Saddam Hussein‘s Iraq, was mobilizing for attacks on the
United States. That‘s from a guy who opposes the war. Now, that proves
the point that there were connections between al Qaeda and Saddam
Hussein. But more to the point, Bush has a good relationship with Putin,
and we‘ve got to operate the Russian oil fields to much greater capacity.
Right now, one of the leading companies is virtually closed down, Yukos
(ph), because their former CEO has been jailed and he‘s on trial, and
there‘s $2 billion or $3 billion of back taxes that could shut this huge
company down. We need to get Russia to move up to 10 or 11 million
barrels a day. That is something that could be done through diplomatic
negotiations, and it would be in the best interests of Russian economy.
That would be a great place to start.
SCARBOROUGH:
Lawrence, economists have been saying for years, for decades now, that
Russia and the former Soviet Union has a tremendous amount of oil and
other natural resources that simply aren‘t being used. So—hey, Lawrence,
thanks a lot. I appreciate you being with us. Mike Battles, also
appreciate your insight.
And coming up
next on this SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY special report, the motive for murder.
Is it all about destabilizing Saudi Arabia and the world economy? That‘s
coming up next.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED
FEMALE: My heart breaks for the Johnson family and for all of Paul‘s
friends. And the brutality of it is unbelievable.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
COLIN POWELL,
SECRETARY OF STATE: If these reports are true about Mr. Johnson, we, of
course, totally condemn this act. It‘s an action of barbarism.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Since 9/11, the Saudi kingdom has been under increasing scrutiny
domestically from both sides of the political aisle. So, many of you are
wondering, how is the murder of Paul Johnson doing going to affect our
relationship with the Saudis? We‘ve got Republican congressman and ally
of George Bush David Dreier from California. We also have Jessica Stern.
She‘s author of “Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill.”
Let me begin
with you, Congressman. Many Americans have been upset with the Saudis‘
relationship with terrorists since 9/11. Do you believe they‘re doing
enough to stop the type of killings that we saw today?
REP. DAVID
DREIER ®, CALIFORNIA: Well, Joe, let me first say that, obviously, our
thoughts and prayers are with the Johnson family. There‘s no way that we
can overstate the degree of anger and outrage that has been shown. You
just saw it there from Colin Powell. President Bush was very strong.
Obviously, the
relationship with—between the United States and the Saudi government is a
very important one. They have been victims of terror. And I think the
statements that were made—for example, the friend of Paul Johnson‘s who
said—a Muslim friend of Paul Johnson who put the message out that he would
curse in his prayers the person who is holding Paul Johnson—and so, there
obviously is division within the Muslim world. And when I say division,,
it‘s obviously a very small group of people. But I think that the
relationship with the Saudi government is, in fact, strengthened because
we join with our resolve. And obviously, Adel al Jubeir made it very
clear that we are going to work together. And when asked the question
today, Joe, whether this was a crime against the United States of America,
his response was this is a crime against humanity. And obviously, we‘re
united with the Saudi...
SCARBOROUGH:
David...
(CROSSTALK)
SCARBOROUGH:
David, why did they let this guy out of prison?
DREIER: Well,
listen, I mean, obviously, I don‘t know. I mean, they used the term “good
behavior” in describing why he was let out of prison. And obviously, we
all hope that, you know, this never happens again.
They‘re clearly
part of the effort, Joe, to have brought this to a head. He‘s the No. 3
guy tied to al Qaeda, and he‘s now dead. And we thank God that this guy
is dead.
SCARBOROUGH:
Jessica Stern, let me bring you in here. Obviously, al Qaeda‘s top
leader, as David Dreier said, in Saudi Arabia was believed to be killed in
the firefight in the capital Friday, shortly after the beheading. And
now, of course, we have confirmation of that. How big of a defeat is that
for al Qaeda and terrorists in the Saudi kingdom?
JESSICA STERN,
AUTHOR, “TERROR IN THE NAME OF GOD”: I don‘t think it is much of a
defeat. I think that it‘s very likely that that man will be replaced
rather quickly. Al Qaeda has really become a movement, as I‘m sure many
of your guests have said. It‘s spreading beyond the original organization
to include many organizations, and individuals even, acting on their own,
creating their own cells, claiming to act in al Qaeda‘s name.
So I‘m afraid
it really gets down to the question that Rumsfeld asked in his leaked
memo: Are we killing and capturing them as quickly as they are reproducing
themselves, as the radical clerics are producing new ones? And I think
the answer is no.
SCARBOROUGH:
Jessica, let me ask you if we‘re playing into their hands by giving them
this much publicity. Obviously, they could have just killed Paul Johnson
several days ago, issued a statement, and wouldn‘t have got this much
press not only in America but across the world. Are we helping them, in
effect, and other media outlets helping them, in effect, recruit new
members by playing into this story where they set this deadline, the news
agencies across the world follow it for several days, and then when he‘s
beheaded in a very gruesome manner, we all jump on the story?
STERN: Yes,
and I think it—we are. It can‘t be helped, however. They are very clever
about this. Terrorists have become extremely clever about how to use the
media to their advantage. And of course, we are putty in their hands,,
unfortunately. It‘s such a horrifying story, such a grisly murder that,
of course, people want to know about it. They want to talk about it,
so...
SCARBOROUGH:
Well, David Dreier...
DREIER: Joe,
let me just say...
SCARBOROUGH:
David...
DREIER: Let me
just say that, clearly, this is something that, obviously, they have tried
to manipulate. I‘ll tell you one thing. Based on the reaction that we
saw standing on the tarmac with the president of the United States, based
on the reaction that I and my colleagues from the United States Congress
have had, based on the reaction of the leadership in Saudi Arabia and
throughout the world and within the Muslim world, I think that dragging
this out, seeing him blindfolded, seeing him state his name, is, in fact,
strengthening our resolve to ensure that we have a victory in this global
war on terror. We know it‘s ongoing, but I think this rededicates all of
us to ensure that this doesn‘t happen again.
SCARBOROUGH:
So what does Congress do to make sure that this doesn‘t happen again and
make sure that Americans that are working in Saudi Arabia, not only for
the benefit of the American economy but also the world economy, can do
that and know that they can come back home safely?
DREIER: Well,
there are a couple of things. And I will tell you, today we passed out
the Homeland Security appropriations bill, a very important measure,
reminding us that as tragic as this is—and Paul Johnson was an American
citizen—we have succeeded since September 11 of 2001 at keeping this off
of American soil. That‘s something about which we can all be proud. On
Monday...
SCARBOROUGH:
David—David, let me—let me hold you—hold you over because we‘ve got—we‘ve
got to go to a break, but we‘re going to come back with both you and also
Jessica Stern in just one minute.
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
SCARBOROUGH:
We‘re back with Republican congressman David Dreier from California and
Jessica Stern.
Jessica, the
Saudis have been telling us for years that they‘re doing everything they
can to crack down on terrorism inside the Saudi kingdom. Do you buy that?
STERN: Well,
they may have been trying to crack down on terrorism inside the Said
kingdom, but I can tell you that I heard for many years from jihadis that
I was interviewing that they were getting a lot of money from Saudi
Arabia. It was no secret. They were very proud that they could go to
Saudi Arabia on fund-raising missions, and they came home successful.
SCARBOROUGH:
And David Dreier, respond to that.
DREIER:
Well...
SCARBOROUGH:
Obviously, fund-raising—al Qaeda gets a lot of money from the Saudi
kingdom.
DREIER: You
know, we obviously know that there was a history. I mean, Usama bin
Laden‘s base in Saudi Arabia is obviously well known. And as I said, a
lot of fund-raising.
You asked me
just before we went to the break, Joe—and that needs to come to an end.
You asked me about what United States Congress is doing. We passed out
the Homeland Security appropriations bill today. On Monday, in the Rules
Committee, we‘re going to be considering the Department of Defense
appropriation bill, a very important measure, which again is going to
underscore our strong commitment on the national security side.
You were
talking earlier with Larry Kudlow about the energy issue. You know, we
have just passed out a series of energy bills, and one of the things we
need to do is we need to vigorously pursue not only that Russian oil about
which Larry was speaking, but also, we need to pursue domestic energy
self-sufficiency. And that‘s why exploration in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge is clearly an option that we need to consider. So there
are a number of steps that we can take through policy to do this. But I
would just underscore again the enact what we‘ve seen over the last
several days has angered and outraged so many that I believe our resolve
is going to be even stronger today than it has been. And it‘s already
been...
SCARBOROUGH:
Jessica...
DREIER: ... as
you know, Joe, very strong.
SCARBOROUGH:
Jessica, you do you believe that‘s the case? Because I keep saying, you
know, after 9/11, America responded, obviously going into Afghanistan and
then Iraq, and after these attacks, Nick Berg, Americans seem to respond
aggressively...
DREIER: I
can‘t hear anything...
SCARBOROUGH:
But it doesn‘t seem that these terrorists get that.
STERN: Well, I
think it does strengthen our resolve, but unfortunately, pictures like
that strengthen their resolve, as well. Bin Laden himself told us that
his followers go for a strong horse, and I‘m afraid that a picture that
makes it clear that this group is humiliating an American citizen in the
most gruesome possible way, humiliating all of us, that‘s very exciting,
unfortunately, to the terrorists.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, Jessica Stern and David Dreier, thank you so much for being
with us.
Again, American
Paul Johnson murdered today in Saudi Arabia. Outrage in Congress, across
the nation and across the world. We‘re going to have more coming up on
this SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY special report. Stick around.
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
GEORGE W. BUSH,
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The murder of Paul shows the evil nature
of the enemy we face. These are barbaric people.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
JOE
SCARBOROUGH, HOST: Tonight, a SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY Special Report:
murder in Saudi
Arabia. American Paul Johnson is beheaded by his al Qaeda captors, and
Saudi officials follow with swift justice, killing al Qaeda‘s top man in
the kingdom who took responsibility for the murder.
So who was Paul
Johnson?
We‘re going to
be hearing from New Jersey‘s U.S. Senator, Jon Corzine, who has been in
close contact with the Johnson family.
Plus, reaction
from the Arab world. Have they condemned the cold-blooded murder or
glossed over it like they did Nick Berg?
And what, if
anything, are they going to do to protect innocent American civilians?
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
ABDEL AL-JUBEIR,
SAUDI FOREIGN AFFAIRS ADVISER: The people of Saudi Arabia are outraged by
the cruel and cold blooded murder of this innocent man.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
The Saudi government was quick to condemn the murder, and killed the man
be responsibility for it. But are the Saudis really our friends, and can
we really trust them? Gerald Posner and Congressman Dan Burton will be
here.
All that
tonight on a special edition of SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY.
ANNOUNCER:
This is a SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY Special Report.
SCARBOROUGH:
So what do we know about Paul Johnson, the 49-year-old family man from New
Jersey, a civil engineer trying to make a living in a land, according to
his family, that he considered home.
I‘m joined now
by Senator Jon Corzine. He is, of course, a Democrat from New Jersey who
has been in close contact with the Johnson family this week.
Senator, thank
you so much for being with us tonight. Tell me about your discussions
with this family throughout the week.
SEN. JON
CORZINE (D), NEW JERSEY: Well, the family was interested in making sure
that American authorities, that Saudi authorities, were doing absolutely
everything that they possibly could. Have we turned over every leaf of
possibility of rescuing and saving their loved one? And a perfectly
reasonable request, and certainly, those of us—not just myself, but
Senator Lautenberg and a number of public officials—were speaking with the
FBI, the State Department, the folks on the ground in Saudi Arabia, and
the Saudi Arabian officials to try to encourage every detail to be
followed to its greatest possible extent.
SCARBOROUGH:
So Senator, obviously, the family asked you, they made a public plea that
the United States government and the Saudi government do absolutely
everything possible that they could do to bring their father home. And
you are confident tonight that, not only did all branches of the United
States government, but also the Saudi government—you are confident that
the Saudis and the U.S. government did everything they could possibly do
to rescue Mr. Johnson?
CORZINE: Well,
I am quite convinced our government did, and I am quite convinced that the
Saudi government had nothing to gain from the outcome that came to pass.
They would have been well served by a rescue, by a different outcome. And
so, there is no way that I think anyone rationally would have sought to
have this be the outcome. They would have tried to do everything they
could, and I think they did.
SCARBOROUGH:
Senator, as you know, the Saudi regime has had a lot of critics here in
America and across the world since 9/11. Obviously, 15 of the 19
hijackers came from Saudi Arabia; bin Laden also, the Saudi nationalists.
Do you believe
that the Saudi government is doing everything that they can do to crack
down on al Qaeda and terrorists that are being funded in Saudi Arabia?
CORZINE: Well,
I don‘t know whether I can make a 100 percent statement that they are
doing everything. I think their policies and their attitudes today are
entirely different than they were two years ago or five years ago or a
decade ago.
SCARBOROUGH:
In what way?
CORZINE: Well,
I think they now recognize that the existence of the royal family is still
is very much at stake, itself. So, I think they have a mutual interest in
resisting and turning back, fighting al Qaeda and those that would try to
overthrow the royal family. So that, whether it‘s for good reason or bad
reason, I think they have changed, dramatically, their policies.
Now that said,
they allowed this cancer to grow to a very serious extent, and to some
extent, it‘s out of their control. They need to take very strict and
stern steps over a long period of time to rid themselves of this radical
Islam minority sect within their society. They need to ask for help. I
mean, I‘m troubled by the fact that the United States is not doing
everything it should be to protecting our expatriates on the ground.
I think they
need—the Saudi family—needs to bring reform to this society. A very
narrow segment of society is doing very well, and a broad segment is
actually living in poverty. So there is a whole host of issues that need
to be addressed here, not just a single dimensional one. But I believe
the Saudi family now understands that their own existence is on the line
here. And so I think their interests are more aligned with ours than they
have been historically.
SCARBOROUGH:
Senator, as much as anybody in the United States Senate or in the House of
Representatives, I think you are qualified to talk on economic issues and
how something like this could affect the world economy, because of your
background.
Are you
concerned that the continued attacks against Americans, British, and other
Westerners working in Saudi Arabia is going to have a negative impact on
the flow of oil out of that country; going to have an impact on oil
futures, world market, that could cause economic chaos, not only here, but
across the world?
CORZINE: Joe,
I think that we are already seeing in the price run up, some people would
say spike, that we have had over the last two months or three months -- $2
gasoline prices—is a direct result from expectations that that kind of
outcome could come to pass. I think that we have seen the terrorists or
the antagonists on the ground in Iraq attack oil fields. There is no
reason to expect that they wouldn‘t try to do the same thing in Saudi
Arabia. I think that‘s reflected in oil prices, and I think it‘s a grave
danger to the economic health of the globe. Saudi Arabia is the warehouse
of oil for the globe.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, Senator Jon Corzine, we greatly appreciate you being with us
tonight.
CORZINE: Thank
you.
SCARBOROUGH:
Still ahead, we‘re going to bring you the world reaction to the murder of
Paul Johnson.
Next, we‘re
going to be discussing whether or not America can trust Saudi Arabia after
their repeated failings in the war on terror. Are they really on
America‘s side?
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
AL-JUBEIR: The
people of Saudi Arabia are outraged by the cruel and cold-blooded murder
of this innocent man. His murder has shaken us to the core.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
DICK CHENEY,
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: All Americans can be certain that
President Bush‘s resolve in this war, America will hunt down these
killers, find them one by one, and destroy them.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Since September 11, Americans have wondered how our supposed ally on the
Arabian Peninsula could export terror. Lately, despite American urging to
crack down on terrorism, it has come home to Saudi Arabia. And now,
American Paul Johnson is dead.
So should Saudi
Arabia be considered a friend or a foe? With me now to talk about that is
Representative Dan Burton. He‘s from Indiana. We also have Mamoun Fandy.
He is the author of “Saudi Arabia and the Politics of Dissent.” And we
also have Gerald Posner, the author of “Why American Slept: the Failure to
Prevent 9/11.”
Dan Burton, let
me begin with you. I want to get your reaction to what happened earlier
today in Saudi Arabia, and answer that question: are the Saudis doing
absolutely everything they can do to protect Americans from terrorism over
there?
REP. DAN BURTON
®, INDIANA: The Saudis are not our friends, Joe. The Saudis have a
business relationship with us. We‘re the largest consumer of energy and
oil in the world, and they sell a lot of oil to us. And we need their
oil, so we have this relationship.
But as far as
them being our friends, no. I led a cordial (ph) over there last year,
and I can tell you for a fact that I don‘t see any signs of friendship.
They have been supporting Wahhabism through their madrasas for a long,
long time, and in those schools that they are supporting, they teach
hatred for Christians and Jews and other Arabs—even Muslims that don‘t
agree with them. And they‘ve been supporting them. They‘ve given, over
the past 10 to 12 years, over $4 billion to various terrorist
organizations. Fifteen of the 19 terrorists that attacked the World Trade
Center were from Saudi Arabia. Osama bin Laden is from Saudi Arabia.
So, in that
society, they have created their own problems. The terrorists have been
trained from birth in that society, and I believe that there is al Qaeda
sympathizers even in the royal family and the military and the police.
SCARBOROUGH:
Gerald Posner, earlier this evening, a spokesman from the Saudi Arabian
government said, The people of Saudi Arabia are outraged, but yet, we
heard last week of a poll that said, 50 percent of Saudis actually support
Osama bin Laden‘s actions over the past several years.
Are the Saudis
shocked and outraged, or are half of them rooting for the murder of as
many Americans and Westerners as possible?
GERALD POSNER,
AUTHOR, “WHY AMERICA SLEPT”: Well, I‘ll tell you, I was surprised
actually, Joe, that only 50 percent in that poll supported bin Laden‘s
activities. The other 49 percent probably said he wasn‘t doing enough
against the Americans. No, I think Congressman Burton is exactly right.
He knows this issue very well. He has been outspoken on it. With friends
like this, who needs enemies?
And I think
that what the Saudi spokesman said, they are outraged, they are, because
this puts them in a very uncomfortable position. The problem here for the
Saudis is—look, there was recently a Royal Canadian Mounted Police
intelligence report that is now coming out that has been the subject of
six months of investigation that said, the Saudis through intermediators,
are still, today, supplying $1 to $2 million a month to al Qaeda
organizations. And, as Congressman Burton knows, when you say, the Saudi
spokesman said today they were outraged, Saudi government representatives,
including Prince Bandar, have come before Congressional committees,
including Congressman Burton, they have lied to us in the past. They
have looked us right in the face and told us lies; we know that those are
lies. We have never looked them back, because of this oil relationship,
and been assert and firm with them as we should be. We said, you‘re
either with us or against us in the war on terror. They have not been
with us.
SCARBOROUGH:
Well, that apparently does not apply to the Saudis.
I want to read
a quick timeline of terror attacks in Saudi Arabia: In
May 2003, a
suicide bomb attack killed 35; in May of this year, gunmen
attacked an
American based company, killing 6 Westerners and a Saudi; and
on May 22,
gunmen shot a German in Riyadh; late May terrorists attacked an
oil compound in
Khobar, killing 22; and on June 2, BBC reporters were shot
· one
was killed, one was injured; and then, of course, today another vicious
murder of a Westerner.
Mamoun Fandy,
let me ask you: Do you believe that what we are seeing over the
past—well, actually, this goes back to May—again, it goes back to May of
2003. Do you think we‘re beginning to see an insurrection against the
House of Saud that may lead us to where Ayatollah Khomeini revolution in
1979 lead Iran?
MAMOUN FANDY,
SENIOR FELLOW, U.S. INSTITUTE OF PEACE: Well, not necessarily so. I
think what we are seeing is that, probably, the war on terrorism pushed
the terrorist to the Middle East, again, to Iraq, to Fallujah, and to
Saudi Arabia, and Algeria, and other places; that these are
practically—the terrorists could not get at America. Now, they are trying
to undermine regimes that they think are protected by American in the
region. So, in a way, I don‘t think—I have visited Saudi Arabia while I
was doing the research for my book many times, and I followed these groups
very extensively—and what I noticed is that you don‘t have a massive
movement in Saudi society that can, with broader support, that might allow
for an Iranian style revolution.
What you have
is really the thugs of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda and their sympathizers
who are out to undermine. Again, the object is the West; the objective is
the oil pipelines; the objective is undermining anybody who does business
with the West in the region.
SCARBOROUGH:
Dan Burton, you know, Mamoun brings up a very good point. Obviously,
there were attacks in America from 1993, the first World Trade Center
bombing, to September 11, obviously, 2001. When we clamped down in
America, the attacks started going to the Middle East, of course, as we
saw in Madrid earlier this year.
Do you think al
Qaeda is attacking in Saudi Arabia now because they have been cut off in
America, their leader in Iraq is saying that Iraq may be a lost cause for
them, and now they are turning their attention to the Saudi Kingdom?
REP. DAN BURTON
®, INDIANA: Well, they know our energy, in large part, comes from Saudi
Arabia, and they would like to drive us out of there, and they would like
to make us—put us in a position where we‘re not getting our energy at a
price we can afford. They like to drive the price up. But as far as the
royal family being supportive of the terrorist movement, there is all
kinds of historical facts for that, Joe. And, in addition, when the
attack took place in the Khobar Towers you just talked about, they
surrounded the place, and yet they let three of the terrorists get away.
So I think the
royal family—at least some in the royal family—are still involved in this
terrorist movements, and they have been training these kids from birth in
these madrasas and Wahhabism, which I said before, teaches them to hate
Christians, Jews, and others.
SCARBOROUGH:
Well, Dan, as you know, obviously during the Khobar Towers investigations,
we in Congress weren‘t allowed to confront the evidence, to dig into the
evidence that we needed to dig into. And also, obviously, the princes in
Saudi Arabia simply refused to go after those schools and get them to stop
teaching hatred towards Jews and towards Westerners.
I want to ask
you, Gerold Posner—a very interesting thing was said earlier from NBC‘s
Jim Miklaszewski, he said, actually, that there are some American
government officials who are raising eyebrows over the timing of al
Qaeda‘s—the killing of al Qaeda‘s top man in Saudi Arabia. They find it
suspicious that soon after Paul Johnson was killed, Saudi forces swooped
in and killed the top al Qaeda leader in Saudi Arabia, suggesting that,
perhaps, they knew where they were all along.
POSNER: Well,
you know, Joe, the interesting thing is that it‘s hard for me to imagine
the Saudis would not have wanted to stop this from taking place. It‘s an
embarrassment to them, all the way around. They don‘t want an American
killed on their soil. It shows the security forces are weak. They
haven‘t penetrated al Qaeda completely.
I talked to a
security analyst tonight in Washington who said that the thing that he was
most interested in, he would love to have a DNA test done on those dead
terrorists to make sure they are indeed who they claim they are; that the
Saudis aren‘t just planting three bodies in a grave and giving them a
proper Muslim burial and claiming they just removed the head of al Qaeda
inside Saudi Arabia when they really didn‘t have anybody at all. So that
would be an interesting follow-up to find out.
But I must tell
you, it goes back to what Congressman Burton was saying—and you know this
from Saudi obstructionism on earlier cases years ago. The royal family is
split. It‘s not just—it doesn‘t move as one large group and everybody
agrees with it. There are radicals inside the family; there are those who
are supportive of terror, who don‘t like the United States; and there are
others who are willing to moderate the family over time. There is a
conflict in there.
But those who
are in powerful positions, who clearly support the terrorists, there has
not been one case or one arrest by the Saudi government of any of the
financiers, of any of the princes. They haven‘t even had their wrists
slapped over the millions of dollars sent out—none of them. And that
includes whether it is Naif, the interior minister, or whether it has to
be Prince Salman, who is the governor of Riyadh who had a conversion to
fundamentalism in the mid-90s, whose son Prince Salman was name by a
terrorist, who we caught, as one of those who was helping al Qaeda for
years. None of this has been looked into aggressively by the Saudis.
I think that
that at some point, some American administration, whether the Bush
administration or whether it is a follow-up administration to the Bush
administration, is going to have to get tough with the Saudis and actually
say, it‘s time to stop this game where you sit on both sides of the fences
and play both sides against the middle. You actually have to choose
here.
SCARBOROUGH:
Mamoun Fandy, is that exactly what is happening in the Saudi government?
They are still
playing, in 2004, both sides of the fence.
FANDY: I
really sort of, I beg to differ with Gerald on this one. I
think they
cannot afford to play both sides of the fence any more. What
you have, you
have to look at really sort of at the region wider than just
Saudi Arabia.
You have hot spots. You have terrorists in the territory,
in the
Palestinian territories, you have terrorists in Iraq, you have
terrorism all
over. And I think most regimes—it‘s not just Saudi Arabia
· most
regimes in the region feel under attack, and they have no choice but to
side with the United States, even if they don‘t like the United States on
this one. Because, otherwise, you have, bin Laden and his boys can take
over one of the most important countries in the region with oil resources
and all of that. And I don‘t think, even if the Saudis allow it, not many
regional players would allow it.
SCARBOROUGH:
Let me bring in Pat Buchanan.
Now, Pat,
Gerald Posner said earlier that we should check the DNA of these men who
were supposedly killed earlier tonight, who were supposedly leaders of al
Qaeda. Now that sounds like a conspiracy theory, until you remember the
“Time Magazine” article that actually talked about three Saudi princes who
were named by a terrorist when he thought, you know, U.S. forces flew him
around in circles, landed him, made him believe that they landed him in
Saudi Arabia to try to scare him, and then he quickly mentioned three
Saudi princes names. He said, just talk to these three Saudi
princes—they‘ll take care of everything.
Of course, you
know how that story ended. All three of those young Saudi princes died of
mysterious circumstances within the next few months. Can we trust the
Saudi government? Can we trust the Saudi leaders who have been linked to
one of the most violent extreme strains of Islam since the House of Saud
was formed in the 1700s?
PAT BUCHANAN,
MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Look, the Saudi leadership and the royal family
are infiltrated, and there are members of that family, I‘m sure, who are
deeply enthusiastic about Osama bin Laden, who detest the American as
infidels who would like us out of there.
But Joe, we
have to ask ourselves: what exactly is the alternative to
the present
monarchy? If that government goes down, the alternative is
Osama bin Laden
and his friends. If they take power, there is going to be
a strategic
disaster for the United States. Well, we ought to put quiet
pressure on the
Saudis. I think this constant berating of Saudi government
·
undermining it, attacking it, calling for cutting it off, and calling for
public pressure on it. If we succeed in knocking this government over,
Joe, look what happened every time we have done it. Egypt we got Nassar;
Libya we got
Gadhafi; in Iran the Ayatollah; and Saddam Hussein and the Ba‘athist Party
in Iraq. So I think we ought to think long and hard before we start
denouncing the government, and then say we got to undermine it, because I
agree with your earlier speaker. They are on our side out of necessity.
SCARBOROUGH:
Dan Burton, I‘ll give you the final word.
BURTON: Pat,
we need to put all the pressure we can on them. Obviously, we do need
them now because we need the energy from that part of world, and we can‘t
led the radical terrorists take over. But at the same time, we have to do
something to make sure they are more active. You can‘t have them continue
to let terrorists get away like they did in Khobar Towers. You can‘t let
them continue to fund terrorists organizations. We have got to put a lot
of pressure on them while working with them. And we need to do one more
thing, Joe, and that is really move toward energy independence. It‘s high
time we did that.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, thanks so much for being with us, Representative Dan Burton and
Gerald Posner. Pat Buchanan and Mamoun Fandy, please stick around. We‘ll
be right back, because coming up on our Special Edition of SCARBOROUGH
COUNTRY we‘re going to see if the rest of the world is as outraged with
Paul Johnson‘s murder as we are here, in America. We are going to take a
look at how the Arab world is reacting to that brutal act next. Plus,
I‘ll be talking to Pat Buchanan about what today‘s murder means to Bush,
to Iraq, and to the war on terror.
(COMMERCIAL
BREAK)
SCARBOROUGH:
Up next on our Special Edition of SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY, we‘re going to
bring you world reaction to the brutal murder of Paul Johnson. Two Arab
reporters are here, live, but first, let‘s get the latest headlines from
the MSNBC News Desk.
CHRISTY
MUSUMECI, MSNBC ANCHOR: Hello, I‘m Christy Musumeci -- 29 past the hour,
here are the headlines:
The body of
Paul Johnson, the American engineer kidnapped, was found outside the Saudi
Arabian capital today. Three grisly photographs were displayed on an
Arabic Web site, confirming that Johnson was, in fact, beheaded. The
49-year-old was kidnapped last weekend by an Islamic militant group that
threatened to kill him by Friday if the Kingdom did not release its al
Qaeda prisoners. Arab television networks are reporting, the leader of al
Qaeda in Saudi Arabia was killed today. Saudi security forces say, Abdul
Aziz al-Muqrin and two other militants were killed while they were
disposing Johnson‘s body in Riyadh shortly after his death.
In other news
tonight, a final farewell to Grammy Award winning entertainer Ray Charles
today. A private funeral was held in Los Angeles, which included
performances by B.B. King, Stevie Wonder, and Willie Nelson. The Rev.
Jesse Jackson and actor Clint Eastwood were among those who spoke at the
funeral. Ray Charles died last week at the age of 73.
Back to
SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY.
ANNOUNCER:
Welcome back to a SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY Special Report.
Once again, Joe
Scarborough.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
AL-JUBEIR: We
hold you our solemn commitment to pursue the criminals and bring them to
justice, and with the help of God almighty, we will. If the intention of
criminals was to shake our resolve, they are mistaken. We are united as a
nation and determined as a people to rid them from our midst.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Let‘s turn now to reaction from the Arab world. There was rejoicing in
some parts of Middle East when American Nick Berg was beheaded.
How will the
news of Paul Johnson‘s murder be received?
With me now
from West Palm Beach, Florida, is Raghida Dergham. She is, of course, a
senior diplomatic correspondent for “Al-Hayat” newspaper. And from
Washington, D.C., we have Mamoun Foundy—Fandy, senior fellow at the United
States Institute of Peace.
I appreciate
both of you being with us tonight.
Raghida, let me
begin with you.
What do you
believe the reaction is going to be on, what is called, the Arab street?
RAGHIDA
DERGHAM, AL-HAYAT NEWSPAPER: Again, it‘s dismay, disgust and anger and
fear. There is already a reaction quite well known on television
networks, and also in the papers tomorrow. I‘m sure, it is going to be
quite disbelief, really, that this has really taken place, because people
are quite angry with what‘s going on. And, probably, the other headline
would be the fact that the Saudis were killed—the terrorists who beheaded
Mr. Johnson.
SCARBOROUGH:
Raghida, there seems to be a bit of a conflict in some statements made
today. Of course, we heard from the Saudi spokesman that the people of
Saudi Arabia were outraged. Yet there is obviously some rejoicing in
parts of the Middle East. And also, there was a poll that was out a few
weeks ago that I‘m sure you are aware of that said about 50 percent of the
Saudi population support Osama bin Laden.
So Americans
and other Westerners that are trying to figure out exactly what is going
on in Saudi Arabia—what should they believe?
DERGHAM: Of
course, there will be pockets of people who are going to rejoice. After
all, there are some followers for al Qaeda, those who are terribly angry,
and the answer they have for the anger with the American policies and
Israeli policies is to say, destroy and to bring down the Saudi royal
family and others in order to replace them. They want power. They are
after power.
But as far as
the general feeling among Saudis, they have felt also betrayed on their
own terms, that is to say after 9/11 because, of course, 15 out of the 19
terrorists who made the 9/11 attacks, they were Saudis. But it seems that
the Saudis were punished as a people. They were termed as terrorists, all
together. And they felt betrayed because Saudi Arabia and the United
States, Joe, as you know, they were partners in Afghanistan, together with
the Pakistanis, where al Qaeda and Taliban were made, in effect.
So, finally,
the other reason is that they feel there is somebody or more than one
party out to bring down Saudi Arabia—the royal family—and destabilize
Saudi Arabia, and that is extremists amongst the militant Islamists, also
extremists in Israel and here, in the United States. They all meet on
this calling: let‘s bring down the Saudi royal family. Chaos as a for the
way for reform, and in fact, some went as far as suggesting plans of
invading Saudi Arabia and breaking it into three parts, so that we could
get our hands on the eastern part for the oil.
SCARBOROUGH:
All right, Mamoun Fandy, I want to play you an exchange between two
different Arab TV commentators. One who says that terrorism of any kind
can‘t be tolerated, and the other says that the fault lies with American
policies in the region.
Take a listen.
(BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED
MALE (through translator): A long-term solution has to rely on a clear
vision that would counter the culture promoted by the terrorists‘
ideology. And the United States should work alongside the Arab countries
from within to present a different model that will tell people that goals
will not be accomplished by terrorists.
UNIDENTIFIED
MALE (through translator): There is an internal problem that is facing
the Arab and Islamic world that has to be dealt with. But also, there is
a problem with the American policies.
(END VIDEO
CLIP)
SCARBOROUGH:
Mamoun, when we hear talk about American policies—in fact, there have been
members, as you know, of the Saudi royal family that have blamed terrorist
attacks, recent terrorist attacks, on American policy and Zionism.
Do you believe
that the majority of the Saudi population is going to wake up tomorrow,
they are going to hear about this death, and they are going to say, this
American had it coming to him because of American‘s policy towards Israel?
FANDY: I
really don‘t think so. I think the graphic and horrific picture that the
world saw would be revolting to everyone. And I, myself, writing for an
Arab-based newspaper, writing a column tomorrow that is very hard hitting.
I know these
speakers who talked before on Arab television, the head of Jordanian
television, Iman Sufadi (ph) is very clear on condemning terrorism. Yet,
the Dr. Ameril Rahib (ph) who lives here and writes from here, he is the
one who is talking about American policy. The man who is coming from
Jordan is very clear that this menace of terrorism that is now creating
havoc in the Middle East should be condemned.
And I think
that second position that is muddying the water when you talk about
resistance in Israel and resistance in Iraq, and all of a sudden, you
confuse the issue of Paul Johnson and the barbaric killing that happened.
I think the Middle East ought to be totally united against terrorism,
whether it is in Iraq, in Palestinian, or in Saudi Arabia, or anywhere
else. But the way we talk, also by accusing the Saudis all the time that
they are in bed with bin Laden, we make them also the enemy, and by
default, we become friends with bin Laden against the Saudi royal family.
We should give the Saudi royal family more space to free their hand to
actually undermine this whole campaign of terror and crush al Qaeda inside
Saudi Arabia.
SCARBOROUGH:
But, Mamoun, put a little perspective on something that
I read earlier,
again on a BBC Web site that I brought up earlier on the
show. I
actually read a sermon, something that was delivered yesterday by
· in
the most holy shrine in all of Islam in Saudi Arabia. And the speaker was
actually condemning terrorism. They were condemning the abduction of Paul
Johnson, and said anybody that kidnaps and kills in the name of Allah will
not go to heaven, and in fact, are doomed to an eternity in hell. Is that
something that is new that is coming out of Saudi Arabia?
Is that because
many of us in the West have been very critical of Islamic leaders, saying
they aren‘t doing enough to condemn these type of killings?
FANDY: I think
the Islamic leaders are our tool to undermine terrorism, and I think we
should encourage statements like this that came from the leader of the
Grand Mosque of Saudi Arabia. I read it myself, and these are the type of
statements that we would like to hear, rather than hear statements
supporting al Qaeda. We would like to encourage these people to actually
take on the intellectual justification of these horrific acts and condemn
it out rightly, and also encourage others to do likewise.
This is the
issue. And instead of just talking like Gerald Posner talked earlier
about Prince Salman being a fundamentalist, actually, he is a totally
wrong guy. I mean, he is the most liberal guy among the princes. So we
have to really build allies, instead of alienating people and making our
friends go towards al Qaeda. We need to push everybody in the Muslim
world to unequivocally condemn terrorism and bring the Koranic and Islamic
justification against al Qaeda...
SCARBOROUGH:
Raghida, I‘ll give you—let me give Raghida the final word.&nbs |